Old thread hit bump limit a while ago:
>>77956370 Older threads:
>>77960478 >>77950327 >>77948017 >>77944280 >>77935233 >>77929371 >>77927194 >>77924395 >>77919698 >>77915268 >>77911941 >>77908658 >>77906309 >>77902963 >>77902963 Current Build Instructions
>SET TIME to 2003-08-01(yyyy-mm-dd)BEFORE extraction >EXTRACT cabs with batch file that comes with it to D:\xpclient if you have no D: extract to C:\xpsrc\xpclient and run subst D: C:\xpsrc >UNSET Read Only >CD to xpclient directory >RUN tools/razzle.cmd offline //add free to build without debug >RUN path tools\sp;%path% >REM lines 154-160 in tools\sp\package.cmd because some TabletPC stuff missing >RUN CheckTestRoot.cmd and CheckTestPCA.cmd >RUN tools\timebuild.pl -NOCLEANBUILD //optional args:-NOSYNC -NOSCORCH >RUN tools\sp\filter >RUN tools\sp\package >RUN tools\postbuild systime.h is here
https://paste2.org/mdeyn2PA exinit.c is here
https://github.com/Zer0Mem0ry/ntoskrnl/blob/master/Ex/exinit.c Server2003 guide: see first posts
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
>>77963845 bluh, those are the wrong exinit and systime files still
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963831 is it still in progress or they gave up? bruteforce attacks can take time, but I can't imagine the password being that long
Anonymous
Please someone sum up the last thread notable events
Anonymous
>>77963849 if it's from an older copy of windows, it's probably missing the codesigning stuff from here.
there's a way to disable codesigning checks as a part of the unattended install file, could try something like that?
really goofy example seems to exist in ./termsrv/setup/tools/un.txt
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
Anonymous
>>77963860 in progress and a lot of errors fixed, still not 100% working but close it seems
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
Anyone got a working key for Windows XP x64 Edition, RTM? I can't seem to find one that works
Anonymous
Anyone who compiled without errors?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963899 can't you read faggot nigger get out
Anonymous
>>77962462 >Maybe you would have to look at windows 3.1, 3.11, 2.0 and so on. 16-bit Windows sources exist in ./base/mvdm/wow16 as far as I can tell. ;)
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77963909 3.1 and 3.11? Or more?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963860 >>77963885 sorry, night crew here. we're not great at summarizing.
Illustrated Progress of Build Success:
>>77960537 Errors in text mode install>>77960577 Errors in graphic mode install>>77961411 ISO size almost on par with production release>>77961484 whatever this is ;)>>77961493 FIRST SUCCESSFUL TEXT MODE PORTION!>>77961531 ... followed by the usual reee (but getting closer!)>>77961795 Different error this timeAnd then some heavy log spelunking.
Anonymous
>>77963925 Most likely portions of Win95, given that development on this started in 1999...
Anonymous
>>77963909 >>77963925 It's at least 3.1 or 3.11.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963945 head user/edit.h
/*++ BUILD Version: 0001
*
* WOW v1.0
*
* Copyright (c) 1991, Microsoft Corporation
*
* EDIT.H
*
* History:
* Created 28-May-1991 by Jeff Parsons (jeffpar)
Anonymous
>>77963950 could even be WinME, now that I think about it. I can't find any definite version info in any of these files so far.
Anonymous
>>77963845 I don't really understand why its that useful to build a full functioning installable iso. As long as the core dlls build that is all that matters.
Anonymous
>>77963892 Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.x64.Edition-WBi
4.) Key: B2RBK-7KPT9-4JP6X-QQFWM-PJD6G
Hope it helps you.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963962 The Win95/98/ME version of the win32 APIs is in base/mvdm/wow32. Anyone want to port that to OS/2? ;)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963964 ISO is a meme, we are perfectly happy to install using winnt.exe.
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
Quoted By:
>>77963969 Yep, this worked! thank you
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77963962 file bin/hc.exe
bin/hc.exe: MS-DOS executable, NE for OS/2 1.x (EXE)
It's Win3.1, 3.11, some bits from earlier maybe, mixed in (and/or compatible with) OS/2 1.x.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963984 lol the one file i didn't even try looking for...
"Of course win16 is Windows 3.1, dummy!"
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963984 This is nice regardless. It's the source to the os many interesting programs and games such as Tong Nou and Chu Teng ran on.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963964 1) for esthetic purposes 2) for the glory irself 3) because it makes it easier to install It in the standard ways
Anonymous
Hey does anyone know what image.lib is and where its source code might live
Anonymous
>>77963989 loads of os/2 binaries scattered throughout - don't forget that we used to have os2ss.exe in our baselines.
RIP it's like we never knew you
Anonymous
Wheres the torrent link bros?? Fuck mega
Anonymous
>>77964006 GDI client library?
$ find . -name image.c
./admin/netui/macprint/pstodib/ti/src/graph/image.c
./sdktools/debuggers/exts/extsdll/image.c
./drivers/ksfilter/ks/image.c
./drivers/wdm/capture/mini/tecra750/image.c
./printscan/ui/compstui/image.c
./inetcore/outlookexpress/wabw/wabapi/dead/image.c
./multimedia/opengl/toolkits/libtk/image.c
./multimedia/opengl/toolkits/libaux/image.c
./windows/core/ntgdi/client/image.c
Anonymous
>>77964017 magnet:?xt=urn:btih:1a4e5b67060ff2bc8fe2de36a6c265c77f392a0c&dn=NOTREPACKED
Anonymous
>>77964024 Based. Thanks. Source on where you got the link from? I just want to confirm.
Anonymous
>>77964037 I made the torrent, source is mega.
Anonymous
>>77964024 That one is fishy. The mega and the one with conspiracy videos didnt had any .exe
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964037 Thank you brother. may the gods bless you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
just use the anonfiles link faggots
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963783 >Isn't ReactOS already way more advanced than Windows XP? I thought it was at Vista/7 level just with bugs. Heh? Hell, ofc no! Their supposedly "compatibility" with Vista/7 isn't more than a ugly hack mixing shim techniques, appcompat documented stuff and wine code, not a true compatibility. Even their code developers acknowledge that. You can check their SxS and kernel32_vista backlog for info.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964050 >using windows to download the leak Anonymous
>>77964050 >the one with conspiracy videos didnt had any .exe that's repacked shit
NOTREPACKED torrent matches hashes at
https://archive.org/details/nt5src Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964050 haha you comedian. You can find hashes in older posts. You can get the repacked one with shit if you want.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964044 I can confirm, it's good
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963964 Because if you don't do it, you will need modify setup files and code to remove dependency on lacking components. You can see in OPs even a small difference fucks the setup procedures.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964023 thank you, one of those is probably right!
Anonymous
>>77964072 Good boy that put my hashes on archive, nice.
btw how come you in 2020 still dont put out hashes to verify?? Its common sense size + few hashes = can always confirm file.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964108 Forgot to add for windows users there is a nice free program called hashtab
http://implbits.com/products/hashtab/ Linux users know how to hash check i bet. :)
Anonymous
Not sure if it's clearly documented here- Put your branch name (I use "Main") in x:\nt\sd.map as: BRANCH xf86fre Main (Not sure what the middle field is; could be for something else). then in \nt\tools\BuildMachines.txt put COMPUTERNAME,primary,Main,x86,fre, (with the final comma). Razzle can be called as: razzle.cmd free officialbuild How do you guys do code quotes btw?
Anonymous
Anyone know if the Windows 3.5 leak from way back was ever reported to be fully buildable? That's the real version of Windows I want to have on my desktop... :)
Anonymous
>>77964008 >our baselines >t. microsoft employee Hehe, thanks for the tip regardless.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964217 >Windows NT 3.5 sigh
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964208 The middle field contains the architecture and the build type (free, debug, checked, profile, and another one, buildx.cmd and related on the tools root dir has more info).
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964223 The OS/2 subsystem shipped on every consumer Windows NT CD before XP was released, so if you ran any of those it was in your baseline whether you wanted it or not!
OS/2 forever!
Anonymous
>>77964208 >razzle.cmd free officialbuild officialbuild means you don't need offline there?
and use <code> & </code> but change <> to []
Anonymous
Quoted By:
this is a test
tralallaal haxorlandia Anonymous
>>77964253 >officialbuild means you don't need offline there? As far as I can tell, this flags your computer as one that's building one of the full test or production builds, and it enables some additional things in the build process. But OpenNTGuy has done tons more without it so it may not be needed.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>cpu usage never gets past 18% why even live?
Anonymous
>>77964278 hmm, I thought offline was needed so it doesn't try connecting to sourcedepot though?
atm i'm using
>razzle free offline officialbuild and really I haven't noticed much different yet compared to before officialbuild (yes, I did setup buildmachines.txt)
hoping postbuild might be different at least, but it's looking like I'll still need to copy a ton of stuff over from RTM ISO
maybe using both offline & officialbuild messed something up though, dunno
Anonymous
>>77963845 ReactOS can eat its heart out
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964363 We are in this together after all.
You should thank the american bro that seeded it so much much more than me!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964326 >much different by different I'm referring to
>>77962094 &
>>77962107 btw,
it's looking like that anon was probably wrong about officialbuild not needing to copy stuff from ISO
hope that the postbuild.err he posted was legit though, since my non-officialbuild postbuild was way bigger than that
Anonymous
can you build this using XP x64?
Anonymous
>>77964402 nah, someone tried it before and razzle failed because of 16bit apps
Anonymous
Here a motivational
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8K90hX4PrE put on loop and keep compiling bros. :D
Anonymous
>>77964422 brother, you have made cringe available. loss of followers is expected
Anonymous
>>77964408 razzel is not a compiled program though, wouldn't it work?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964459 there are 16 bit components and subsystems that don't play nice with x64.
Anonymous
>>77964459 it calls 16bit compiled programs though afaik
>>77942707 is the pic someone posted Anonymous
>>77964470 oddly enough that razacl.exe that failed in the pic seems to be an amd64 app, maybe whoever took that pic just messed something up?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964442 Bro theres only God and me, no need for any followers.
Anonymous
>>77964486 why don't you try then and report back?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964502 i'm in the middle of building shit
just saying it's probably still worth a try
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
>>77964486 razacl amd64 here- working fine
Anonymous
>>77964511 are compile times faster on XP x64?
Anonymous
is there anything those of us who don't understand programming can do to help with progress?
Anonymous
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
Quoted By:
>>77964522 I'll have to get back to you on that
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964534 no, name and logo have already been made.
maybe make some diaper porn of OS-tan?
ThatOpenNTGuy vF5a7vP/3w
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964534 You can start by not posting anime shit here thank you very much.
Anonymous
Does this have potential to improve Linux compatibility with Windows software?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77964522 i think the main reason why it's so slow is because of IO bottlenecks.
it seems reluctant to put anything into ram so you have to wait on the disk. wonder if this can be fixed.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77964571 If you had money and had a pc with 128gb of ram, you could put a vm on a ram disk. Dont think it would help you much, ssds are fast and i bet them compiler bros all have vms on ssd.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964574 SDD is still like a billion times slower than RAM.
>>77964580 >you could put a vm on a ram disk hmm. interesting idea. though you could probably get away with just putting the source on ram disk.
Anonymous
>>77964570 Why not? Source code leaks are almost always good for emulation.
Anonymous
>>77964594 he thinks that they're going to get into legal trouble somehow lol
terry davis from team fortess 2
>>77964594 sure but unless the wine guy wants to get arrested and have some one on one action with big tyrone in jail he's not able to use nor mimic it, and it's unlikely af anyone's gonna start up an anon emulator from the ground up with this
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964597 Everyone looks but no one says a thing.
Anonymous
>>77964612 You do NOT understand american law.
Anonymous
>>77964571 maybe one of these
C COMPILER OPTIONS -MEMORY MODEL- /AS small model (default) /AC compact model /AM medium model /AL large model /AH huge model /AT tiny model /A<string> (custom memory model) found in \tools\tools16\cl.msg
there are more interesting flags there
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964551 Go away karachan polack, glownigger and/or mkultra shill.
terry davis from team fortess 2
>>77964621 4chan is known for having people that know what they're talking about
Anonymous
so postbuild.err from "razzle free offline officialbuild" gave this... a lot different to anons pic here
>>77962107 now i'm pretty sure he was memeing us, damn, got me to waste another 3 hours of building...
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964642 and shit posting name fags
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964644 The actual real problems now:
>Some shit doesnt compile (olepro32.dll) >put winlogon and the rest of the binaries >put the missing files that flcheck is asking >solve the rest in postbuild Anonymous
Quoted By:
You no compile code you go hell now!
Anonymous
>>77964571 Well, I have 64g of RAM so I suppose I could make like a 20g RAM disk.
Anonymous
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
>>77964571 actually, most file operations are much faster on x64, especially with SSD- Windows XP x86 on a Ryzen 7 with 16 threads allocated and 4GB of RAM on an SSD is painfully slow- took around 5 hours to compile.
terry davis from team fortess 2
>>77964715 thank you glowie, very cool
send this shit over anonfiles faggot
Anonymous
>/g/ gets its hands on a huge source leak >instead of arguing over irrelevant dumb shit it proceeds to do actual /g/ things >is close to getting it to build properly over just a couple days >And even actually made the logo Yep, 2020 is the end of the world. Pretty much guaranteed at this point. Good job in the meantime however, never thought you boys would have it in ya.
Anonymous
>>77964730 demo apps link: b5r3rca8pe/programs_7z
Anonymous
>>77964764 >b5r3rca8pe/programs_7z No source code with them faggot
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
Quoted By:
Update: Building on straight AMD64 is so much faster than on x86- like, light years ahead. You might need to recompile the build tools as they have a broken export to msvcrt (__YAXPAX or some shit)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964722 well found my awnser then, looks like im going to upgrade to x64 tomorrow.
just out of curiosity, that whats the ram and CPU usage compiling on x64 looking like? couldn't get past 300mb ram and 13% cpu usage on a 24 core 3990x.
Anonymous
>>77964752 which logo was decided on?
Anonymous
>>77964801 all of them enduser decideds ofcorz!
Anonymous
>>77964772 done: tcx5r0a9pc/programssourcecode_rar
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77964814 Nice now pack it all in 1 file, so you have compiled and source dirs.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77964825 done: R5z4rba1pc/demoapps_rar
Anonymous
>>77964752 it's just a few people, if not only 1 guy who has been compiling stuff autistically
and yes, there have been whole threads of pure trolling and retardation, mostly by a a few faggots that keep trying to kill these threads.
Anonymous
>>77964837 Now compile hello since its not compiled in that rar.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964849 >if not only 1 guy I can safely say at least 2 guys.
Anonymous
>>77964857 make sure to also put your right foot in, and take your right foot out, and of course shake it all about. Do the hokey pokey and don't forget to turn yourself around!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
git hidden service noexit4237wjhu6v[dot]onion/psych0/nt5_src
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964692 The compilation artifacts are like 40gb. Put 60, or more, to be safe.
Anonymous
>>77964722 should have been more clear, by "its so slow" I meant "x86 is so slow"
whatever, doesnt matter, it's just good to see that building on x64 might actually be worth the trouble.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964555 Not directly, but it can help documenters to find out secret functions of shipped windows binaries.
Anonymous
>>77964929 wait, fuck, no, I meant build.exe or cl.exe (or whatever does the compiling)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964947 thanks i forgot i had it open in edit mode
Anonymous
>>77964950 but wait, if it really is that much faster building on x64 than it is on x86, then x86 WAS creating an IO bottleneck
so wait FUCK third times a charm, I did mean x86.......
please forget all of my posts
terry davis from team fortess 2
>>77964966 are you having a stroke anon
Anonymous
>>77965010 no he is polish
terry davis from team fortess 2
Quoted By:
>>77965020 actually he's irish
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965010 its fucking 2 am, should be sleeping, instead trying to get this shit to compile
Anonymous
Anonymous
Hey anyone remembers the name of that version of windows that is all blue and looked really nice and was never released?
terry davis from team fortess 2
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964534 contribute to the Readme
noexit4237wjhu6v[dot]onion/psych0/nt5_src
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965057 Neptune or Longhorn.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965500 This post is a spam.
Anonymous
Fuck, anon can you pin to topic changelog. Did you build in iso?
Anonymous
anyone have a working Mega with XP source?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965201 yep but setup fails, as shown in OP pic
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965285 fuck, i dunno what kind of key it wants though
edition is standard eval, standard key didnt work though, must need an eval key?
Anonymous
terry davis from team fortess 2
Quoted By:
>>77965285 Nicely done guy
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965285 Not even the moon landing was that epic.
Anonymous
What's the appeal of this besides autism? You can't legally do anything with this and Linux/ReactOS already has the freetard aspect of all this covered. What are you faggots doing with this?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965303 Maybe we can remove this step from the code
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965303 You guys should try to remove activation once a working Yotsuba XP is made
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965315 Fun. You hate fun anon?
terry davis from team fortess 2
Quoted By:
>>77965315 99% of torrents aren't legal either yet here they are
Anonymous
>>77965303 phew, found a working key
needed small business server key for some reason
BBGC6-TXDG9-J9CDW-JXK3R-GTMMB
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965303 You have the power now, modify this
>>77946979 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965315 >What are you faggots doing with this? We arent civvl slaves, thats enough.
Anonymous
>>77965328 Fun is cool but seriously what's the end goal for this?
Anonymous
>>77965262 Is this based from the anonfiles link? I hope so, else this gofile link would be tainted and unusable.
Anonymous
>>77965351 custom XP distros modified to the point of being able to run win7 programs.
terry davis from team fortess 2
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965351 None, fun can have no end goal. As long as we got enjoyment from it, that is what matters.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965354 onion link in thread
Anonymous
>>77965285 >>77965303 >>77965341 this shit hasn't even been out for a fucking WEEK
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965341 Nigga, GET TO THE DESKTOP BRO
Anonymous
So which theme are you going to use /g/? For me it's Classix10k 2
Anonymous
>>77965373 Meanwhile it took the opennt guys 4 months for a single dll!
Anonymous
shit, did bill gates bag him already?!?!?
Anonymous
>>77965351 anything we want
can do
>>77965356 can rewrite parts to make it run better
security patches
redesign the system to install and update all software components through a package manager
anything we have enough time and autism for
Anonymous
>>77965384 >Classix10k You got the link for that? I want to put this on my thinkpad.
Anonymous
>>77965341 lets get some details on how you achieved this? just moved missing files over from the isos?
that opennt guy
>>77965385 fuck you, nigger
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965389 >redesign the system to install and update all software components through a package manager Windows is the new Linux
Anonymous
>>77965390 Not really lol, im contacting the cretor on DeviantArt as all links from 2007 seem dead
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965393 I recognize that times were different back then. 4chan was just one year old, for instance.
Anonymous
thats it... he's dead... must have released mustard gas.
Anonymous
Anonymous
So the TODO list is: Make it lighter and clear any botnet related code Add up to DirectX12 support Add Linux Subsystem anything else??? profit
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965341 WHAT DID YOU SEE ANON
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
is it going to be possible to run this on kabylake chips if the build/iso shenanigans get sorted out?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965448 lossy compression
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965448 pointless. we need instructions.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965451 Nice some kid was so happy for that cake!
Anonymous
there we go, setup took so fucking long
>>77965391 yeah mostly, in a nutshell:
>follow the server2003 guide I made with timebuild and shit >import tools/driver.pfx (double click and hit next on the import wizard) >after all the steps check binaries.x86fre/build_logs/postbuild.err and grab all the missing files mentioned in there from ISO >edit tools/postbuildscripts/pbuild.dat and comment out the sxs_make_asms_cabs lines >grab asms01.cab from w2k3 ISO and put that into binaries.x86fre, and binaries.x86fre/srv/i386, replacing the one thats there >run timebuild one more time and it should sign all the shit for you, now you should have a working setup inside binaries.x86fre/srv/ >finally use oscdimg to turn that into bootable iso I was replacing asms01.cab after timebuild before which must have fucked up signatures or something, commenting pbuild.dat lets us replace cab before timebuild though
Anonymous
They got him, RIP the last white man OS
Anonymous
>>77965384 Very beautiful. The hard disk icon might use some improvement though.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965351 i fucking hate people like you
kys
terry davis from team fortess 2
Quoted By:
>>77965472 holy shit, nice!!!!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 also you'll need to set date of your VM to before 2006 when installing it, since the test cert expired then
maybe someone can figure out how to renew it or something
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965461 You mean x64? We will see.
>>77965472 >>follow the server2003 guide I made with timebuild and shit which post? There's too many....
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965438 Bro also we need add new winapi support
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965477 All of it was done by a single Mexican guy so I think it's neat
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965476 >They got him, RIP the last White Man OS FTFY, you faggot. Learn to capitalize our Blessed Race properly, disrespectful piece of shit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965487 >which post the guide in
>>77956370 seems about right
Anonymous
>>77965472 based windowsfag building windows on windows
Anonymous
>>77965472 http://noexit4237wjhu6v.onion/explore/repos now start sending out patches, user tor and torsocks to use git over tor.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 ITS HAPPENING
next step is we get a bat file to automate everything.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965496 Based, checked and redpilled.
The builderanon isn't dead though
>>77965500 Based, checked and redpilled.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 also the oscdimg params are
>oscdimg -n -betfsboot.com D:\binaries.x86fre\srv srv.iso assuming
etfsboot.com is in your current folder
Anonymous
>>77965472 what about BuildMachines.txt? Not needed?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 Absolutely based
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 thank you bro, you own this thread
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965191 >>77965500 What did i tell you? :D
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965516 i did use it for this build, but it didn't really seem to change much IMO, all the same files were missing etc
it might have helped get rid of some errors in postbuild.err though but I can't really remember now
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 literally witnessing history right here
Anonymous
should have asked for a screen cap
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 Well done
Long live anonymous closed source
Anonymous
Quoted By:
a milestone for the mankind not even microshit built it that fast. (well all things considered)
Anonymous
>>77965472 >tfw when i wake up to this Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965543 Fuck off.
>>77965472 he is based but it's not worth killing thread for "muh i got into screencap"
terry davis from team fortess 2
Quoted By:
windows xp diamond edition confirmed
pvnfu !V2PBPH1twg
Anonymous
>>77965472 what a sense of euphoria
now we should probably zip up all of the extra stuff needed to make it work and work on an automated build script so people get up and ready faster
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Karachan shills btfo
Anonymous
Quoted By:
linuxfags & unixfags with their cucked coc shit BTFO
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965561 THIS, we need an automated script so we can make changes and build it fast.
Anonymous
>>77965472 btw server2003 does generate pro & per editions too, lots of stuff in binaries.x86fre/pro/, I tried booting that but it needed sparrow.sys or something & couldn't find that in any server 2003 iso
maybe if we get that working we can have pretty much XP without needing to dick with the other source tree, and without needing to try disabling server shit on w2k3
wonder if we can just find where that sparrow crap is referenced and remove it, hm
Anonymous
>>77965558 Here come the tripfags to shit up the thread.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965549 >tfw was about to go sleep Anonymous
I'll be disappointed if it's not called Windows XD.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
alright my negros, as much as I've trolled in the last threads, well done. this is awesome. well played. someone let lauren from vice writing for motherboard know about this
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965582 lol I've been watching this thread since the one before it, I just wanted to make sure to appear in some history book uwu
Anonymous
>>77965577 oh huh, sparrow.sys is inside drivers\xpdrivercab\x86fre\driver.cab, hmmmm
Anonymous
Quoted By:
PingosXD
>>77965597 Server 2003 Pro confirmed
Anonymous
>>77965593 >history book The only history book this thread will be in is some screenshot scrapbook by some nigger on a subreddit
Anonymous
What is the state of XP iso efforts?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965605 enough for me man
Anonymous
before this thread reaches to reddit or some newshit, get this thread to bump limit
Anonymous
>>77965472 >tfw was in the thread that started all of this with skitzo anon was trying to crack rar with biblical references they grow up so fast
terry davis from team fortess 2
>>77965613 it's working anon. it's working
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965613 we got server2003 man, we don't need outdated XP shite
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965617 Kill it to stop reddit shills. Dare I say, based.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
hell yeah kill the thread
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965605 Gtfo you demoralizing karachan polack troll, glownigger and/or mkultra shill.
>>77965613 Stop being blind faggot.
Anonymous
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOYX5vrbnhE Good job anon. Have you already chosen the name?
t. didn't read previous threads.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965617 the new op pastas are under construction, bump it
terry davis from team fortess 2
Quoted By:
raeddit moment
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 >tfw was in the thread that started all of this with skitzo anon trying to crack rar with biblical references they grow up so fast
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965618 it's all started from schizoposting
woah....and to this....
>>77965472 Anonymous
>>77965643 No, if you're using a tripcode. You have no reason to exist.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
IM BACK WITH YOU BABY I TOLD YOU NOT TO CRY IM BACK OKAY IM BACK COME HEREE
Anonymous
>>77965645 we had previously decided that it'd be named OpenXP
Anonymous
>>77965654 Wrong anon. He did not even use a trip you nigger.
Anonymous
>>77965663 Make it CloverXP
Anonymous
>>77965645 >thinking name and logo isnt the first thing /g/ does Anonymous
The default theme should be the Windows Celestial theme that that guy made with the theme tool from the leak
Anonymous
>>77965643 I see server is done, asking about XP, not everyone here lives in a third world timezones
>>77965620 >>77965623 So the build instructions in OP are all there is to it?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965675 lol fuck off niggerr read for once
Anonymous
>>77965670 I replied to this faggot originally big brain.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965663 anything but that soulless shit
Anonymous
Windows XD EBIN ebition :DDD
Anonymous
>>77965675 XP... let's just say it has not had the same focus as w2k3. But it can be done.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965472 for the new pasta, is this relevant:
>>77964208 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965675 >>77965694 They are the same fucking thing shut the fuck up niggers
Anonymous
>>77965675 we focused more on server because it was more complete and was the better OS anyways. Next up is to try get an x64 version.
Anonymous
>>77965698 Keep sucking the assholes of gay strippers like all tripfags
>>77965704 Okay.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965707 >>77965472 this is way more relevant.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77965718 >Keep sucking the assholes of gay strippers No thanks, I only suck the asshole of my girlfriend and future wife
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965707 i did buildmachines.txt update and used "razzle free offline officialbuild", but not totally sure it's needed
maybe worth mentioning those for now till someone can see if we really need them
Anonymous
>>77965723 They are both relevant nigger, you can't build it without every step
Anonymous
Quoted By:
windows xp with windows 7/10 WDDM module when? I want my epic RTX graphics card on it
Anonymous
>>77965726 >girlfriend and future wife That's a weird way to say trap
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965354 It's the original. You can check the md5 or sha sum
Anonymous
>>77965743 >That's a weird way to say trap wouldn't mind but she has a vagina and I like it very much thanks
Anonymous
>>77965751 A flesh wound isn't a vagina anon
Anonymous
Quoted By:
*click*>that time 4chan hacks leaked Microsoft's biggest secret
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965735 are you illiterate or something?
Anonymous
Anonymous
I can see all the articles about "famous hacker 4chan also known as anonymous fucked Microsoft and basically you are stupid" and everyone like uhh yess you goo
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 MICROSOFT IS DEAD
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965776 Yhey shold've put some curtains and dogs.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
microshit btfo
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 WinChad right here
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
someone needs to create new brand war threads so that this thread moves to the archive
Anonymous
>>77964542 anyone doing this yet? I'll do it
Anonymous
>>77965888 Yes, it was the first thing we did.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965864 Those are cancer. Just wait, it is the fate of all threads to go to the archive.
Vice Media
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965503 >noexit 2 spooky 4me
Anonymous
Anonymous
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
Quoted By:
>>77965472 wow, great job anon! I'll try replicating your steps to see if I get a bootable image man
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965934 No jews and jewish whores allowed here
ThatOpenNTGuy !vF5a7vP/3w
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77965472 Can you share the iso please ?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77963845 Win XP on ARM when?
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>77963845 >SET TIME to 2003-08-01(yyyy-mm-dd)BEFORE extraction why do you have to do this?
Did microsoft add something to prevent it from being compiled after or on a certain date?
Anonymous
>>77966546 test cert expired in like 2006 so we have to set date before it
cert could probably be replaced but nobody looked into how yet
Anonymous
>>77966546 >>77966559 it throws errors at you because if you dont do that because it checks creation time and if you dont change your date it thinks the files are from the future
Anonymous
>>77966594 I never had that issue and I never changed my date. However, I only tried to build Win2k3.
Anonymous
>>77966783 Interesting. Razzle fails for me on 2k3 when I try to build without changing the time.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77966822 the only thing it complained about was the certs, which I've been too lazy to change with my own.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>77964644 I didn't saw it until I was about to shutdown my computer, but I originally was running the postbuild process on the pro sku (postbuild -full -l:usa -sku:pro), and it was not running the file check properly for some reason, when I switched back to the srv sku, all the errors came back
>>77964644